Post- versus intra-operative implant for breast cancer interstitial brachytherapy: How to choose?

Purpose: Breast brachytherapy (BB) represents an important radiation therapy modality in modern breast cancer treatments. Currently, BB is mainly used for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI), local boost after whole breast radiation therapy (WBRT), and as salvage re-irradiation after second lumpectomy (APBrl). Two multi-catheter interstitial brachytherapy (MIB) techniques can be offered: intra-operative (IOB) and post-operative (POB) brachytherapy. The aim of this article was to summarize current available data on these two different brachytherapy approaches for breast cancer. Material and methods: A literature search was performed, and different experiences published by BB expert teams were analyzed and compared. These two different brachytherapy approaches for breast cancer have also been presented and discussed during meetings of the GEC-ESTRO BCWG. In addition, expert recommendations were defined. Results: A comprehensive description and practical comparison of both the techniques, i.e., IOB and POB, considering the latest available published data were presented. Different technical, logistic, and clinical aspects of both the methods were thoroughly examined and analyzed. This detailed comparison of the two breast brachytherapy techniques was supported by scientific data from extensive experience of experts, facilitating an objective analysis that, to our knowledge, has not been previously published. Conclusions: Based on the comprehensive analysis of both the brachytherapy techniques available, this article serves as a valuable resource to guide breast teams in selecting the optimal BB technique (POB or IOB), considering hospital environment, multi-disciplinary collaboration, and patient logistics.

Very accelerated partial breast irradiation in 1 or 2 days: Late toxicity and early oncological outcome of the GEC-ESTRO VAPBI cohort.

PURPOSE: To analyze late toxicity after very accelerated partial breast irradiation (VAPBI) for low-risk breast cancer. MATERIALS: Methods: In this retrospective, observational, international multicenter study (HDH F20220713143949), patients with low-risk breast cancer underwent lumpectomy + vAPBI (high-dose rate multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy-MIBT). VAPBI was performed with 4(4x6.2 Gy/2d), 3(3x7.45 Gy/2d) or 1 fraction (1x16Gy or 1x18Gy/1d). Primary endpoint was late toxicity. Secondary endpoints were cumulative incidence of breast cancer local relapse (LR) and distant metastatic relapse (DMR) and specific (SS) and overall (OS) survivals. Prognostic factors for late toxicity were analyzed. RESULTS: From 01/2012 to 06/2022, 516 pts with early breast cancer were enrolled. Median follow-up was 44 months [95 %CI 39-46]. Median age was 71 years [40-100]. Median tumor size was 12 mm [1-35]. VAPBI delivered 1, 3 and 4 fractions for 205pts (39.7 %), 167pts (32.4 %) and 144pts (28 %) respectively. 221 late toxicity events were observed in 168pts (32.6 %) (Fibrosis, dyschromia, pain and telangiectasia). Grade 2 and 3 late toxicities were observed in 7.2 and 0.6 % respectively (no G4) with no difference between 1 and ≥ 2 treatment days. CTV > 50 cc (p = 0.007) and V150 > 40 % (p = 0.027) were prognostic factors for G ≥ 2 late toxicity. Four-year cumulative incidence rates of LR and DMR were 2 % [95 %CI 0-3] and 1 % [95 %CI 0-2] respectively. CONCLUSIONS: VAPBI based on 1 or ≥ 2 days of MIBT represents an attractive de-escalation of irradiation approach for low-risk breast cancer. Late toxicity profile appears acceptable while early oncological outcome shows encouraging local control. Longer follow-up is warranted in order to confirm these preliminary results.

Salvage brachytherapy for second ipsilateral breast tumor event: Relating dosimetric analysis to late side effects.

PURPOSE: For second ipsilateral breast tumor event (2ndIBTE), conservative treatment (CT) involving wide local excision plus accelerated partial breast reirradiation (APBrI) is increasingly used as an alternative to mastectomy. This study investigates the impact of APBrI technique and multicatheter interstitial high dose-rate brachytherapy (MIB) dosimetry parameters on toxicity and survival in patients with 2ndIBTE. MATERIALS-METHODS: Data from patients with 2ndIBTE treated with CT, were analyzed. Inclusion criteria specified 2ndIBTE occurring at least one year after 1st CT for primary breast cancer. Treatment details and dosimetry parameters were recorded. Primary endpoint was late toxicity. Secondary endpoints were late toxicity prognostic factors analysis and oncological outcome. RESULTS: From 07/2005 and 07/2023, 201 patients (pts) received 2nd CT. With a median follow-up of 49.6 months (44.9-59.5), tumor size was less than 2 cm (88.1%), with estrogen receptor positive (92.7%). Patients were low (63.7%) or intermediate (29.8%) GEC-ESTRO APBI risk classification. Late toxicities were observed in 34.8% (G1 52.3%, G2 40.7%). Cutaneous fibrosis was the most common toxicity. Cosmetic outcomes were excellent in 64.1%. Dosimetry analysis revealed positive correlations between complications and absolute volumes of CTV, V100, V150, and V200. Volumes requiring higher needle number and lower DNR resulted in fewer complications. 5-year disease-free and overall survival were 88% and 95% respectively. CONCLUSION: Second CT for 2ndIBTE showed favorable oncological outcomes and survival rates. Complications were correlated with specific dosimetric parameters, emphasizing the importance of tailored treatment planning. This study provides valuable insights in risk stratification and MIB optimization for APBrI.

Second Conservative Treatment for Local Recurrence Breast Cancer: A GEC-ESTRO Oncological Outcome and Prognostic Factor Analysis.

PURPOSE: For second ipsilateral breast tumor event (2nd IBTE), second conservative treatment (2nd CT) combining lumpectomy plus accelerated partial breast reirradiation (APBrI) represents a curative option. The aim of this study was to analyze oncological prognostic factors for patients with a 2nd IBTE treated with 2nd CT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: An analysis of clinical practices was conducted across 7 academic hospitals/cancer centers in 6 European countries based on the GEC-ESTRO database. Patients presenting a 2nd IBTE occurring after conservative surgery (lumpectomy + axillary evaluation) and irradiation performed for the primary tumor underwent a 2nd CT with brachytherapy-based APBrI. The main outcome was 5-year cumulative incidence (CI) rate of second local relapse. All analyzed patients were classified according to risk groups for Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie-European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (GEC-ESTRO) accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) and molecular classification and time interval between first and second breast surgery (TIS1S2). Finally, we combined GEC-ESTRO APBI, molecular, and TIS1S2 risk groups, leading to the definition of a new score (named TAM: score based on the combination of time interval [T] between first and second surgery and APBI [A] and molecular [M] classifications) specifically designed for 2nd IBTE oncological outcome analysis. RESULTS: From July 1994 to January 2021, a total of 508 patients received a 2nd CT. At the time of 2nd IBTE, median age was 64.6 years (range, 56.2-72.6). With a median follow-up of 60.9 months (56.2-72.6), the 5-year second local relapse CI rate was 4% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2%-6%). The 5-year distant metastasis disease CI rate was 7% (95% CI, 4%-10%). Five-year disease-free and overall survival rates were 89% (95% CI, 86%-93%) and 91% (95% CI, 88%-94%), respectively. In multivariate analysis, TAM score was an independent prognostic factor for all the oncological items (P < .001) except disease-specific survival (P = .07) and overall survival (P = .09). The grade ≥3 late toxicity rate was 12.1%. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis of 2nd CT combining lumpectomy with APBrI for 2nd IBTE confirmed the excellent oncological results obtained after 2nd CT. Furthermore, the GEC-ESTRO TAM score appears to be an important prognostic factor, assisting patients and physicians in the decision-making process.

Comparison of outcome after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy of patients with metachronous lung versus primary lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Early-stage lung cancer, primarily treated with surgery, often occur in poor surgical candidates (impaired respiratory function, prior thoracic surgery, severe comorbidities). Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is a non-invasive alternative that provides comparable local control. This technique is particularly relevant for surgically resectable metachronous lung cancer, in patients unable to undergo surgery.. The objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcome of patients treated with SABR for stage I metachronous lung cancer (MLC) versus stage I primary lung cancer (PLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: 137 patients treated with SABR for stage I non-small cell lung cancer were retrospectively reviewed, of which 28 (20.4%) were MLC and 109 (79.6%) were PLC. Cohorts were evaluated for differences in overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), metastasis-free survival, local control (LC), and toxicity. RESULTS: After SABR, patients treated for MLC have comparable median age (76.6 vs 78.6, p = 0.2), 3-year LC (83.6% vs. 72.6%, p = 0.2), PFS (68.7% vs. 50.9%, p = 0.9), and OS (78.6% vs. 52.1%, p = 0.9) as PLC, along with similar rates of total (54.1% vs. 42.9%, p = 0.6) and grade 3 + toxicity (3.7% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.9). Previous treatment of MLC patients was either surgery (21/28, 75%) or SABR (7/28, 25%). The median follow-up was 53 months. CONCLUSION: SABR is a safe and effective approach for localized metachronous lung cancer.

Workflow optimization of brachytherapy-based very accelerated partial breast irradiation.

PURPOSE: For low-risk breast cancer, accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is a level 1 evidence procedure. Brachytherapy based very APBI (vAPBI) makes it possible to perform adjuvant irradiation in 4 to 1 fraction. However, vAPBI organization is critical. The aim of this technical note is to report on its optimization. METHODS AND MATERIALS: To offer to low-risk breast cancer patient an efficient, simple, rapid adjuvant irradiation with a reduced number of hospital visits, a new organization of vAPBI based on a single fraction was established, merging all the different steps (from first consultation to irradiation) into a 4-5-consecutive-hour period. This therapeutic program was developed in strong collaboration with radiation oncologists, medical physicists, radiation therapists, and the medical secretary. RESULTS: After the validation of adjuvant breast irradiation, the patient was offered a telemedicine consultation with the radiation oncologist. Then, the day of vAPBI, the patient arrived at the brachytherapy unit at 08:00 AM for an in-person consultation followed by a preimplant CT scan (defining catheter number and position). After breast local anesthesia, catheter placement was performed followed by a postimplant CT scan for planning purposes. A total dose of 16 Gy in 1 fraction was delivered before removing the catheters. The patient was discharged from the brachytherapy unit around 12:30 PM with an upcoming surveillance consultation date. CONCLUSIONS: VAPBI organization optimization makes it possible to propose a short 5-h procedure from medical consultation to treatment with only one round trip. Strict organization among staff is required.

Outcomes following brachytherapy boost for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer: A retrospective bicenter study by the SFRO brachytherapy group.

INTRODUCTION: Radiotherapy dose escalation improves biochemical control in intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer. Brachytherapy boost was shown to further improve biochemical control compared to radiotherapy alone in three randomized trials. The SFRO brachytherapy group sought to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of BT-boost for intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer in real life, and to determine prognostic factors for efficacy and toxicity. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A retrospective study was conducted, including all patients with intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer treated with a combination of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and high dose-rate brachytherapy boost (HDR-BB), from 2006 until December 2019 at two centers. Patient characteristics, initial disease, treatment and follow-up were collected. RESULTS: 709 patients from two centers were analyzed given a short follow-up in the other centers. Out of those, 277 were intermediate risk (170 favorable and 107 unfavorable) and 432 were high risk. The median EBRT and HDR-BB doses were 46 Gy (35-50) and 14 Gy (10-20). After a median follow-up of 62 months, biochemical control at 5 years was 87.5 % for the overall population, 91 % and 85 % for intermediate- and high-risk cancers, respectively. At 5 years, biochemical and clinical relapse-free survival, metastasis-free survival and local control rates were 83 %, 90 % and 97 % respectively. 5-years overall survival was 94 %. Late grade 2 or higher GU or GI toxicity was found in 36 patients (5 %) and 9 patients (1.3 %). CONCLUSION: This bicenter analysis shows the efficacy and tolerability of HDR-BB as a complement to external radiotherapy. Further improvements such as combination with new hormonal agents or new brachytherapy-radiotherapy fractionation regimens are warranted to improve further the outcomes and therapeutic ratio.

10-Year oncological outcome report after second conservative treatment for ipsilateral breast tumor event.

Purpose: To analyze long-term oncological outcome after 2nd conservative treatment (2ndCT) for patients with ipsilateral 2nd ipsilateral breast tumor event (2ndIBTE). Materials/methods: In this retrospective observational study (N°F20210402152843), patients with 2ndIBTE underwent 2ndCT (lumpectomy + tumor bed re-irradiation). 3rdIBTE (3rdIBTE-FS), regional relapse- (RRFS) and metastatic disease- (MD-FS) free survivals as well as disease-free (DFS), specific (SS) and overall (OS) survival were analyzed. Late toxicity was reported. Results: Between 09/2000 and 04/2022, 244 patients presented a 2ndIBTE and underwent a 2ndCT. Among them, 113 pts with a minimum follow-up of 60 months were analyzed. Median time interval between 1st and 2ndIBTE was 13.5 years [2-35]. Median 2ndIBTE age was 66.2 years [31-85]. 2ndIBTE were adenocarcinomas (77 %). Tumor size was < 20 mm (86.7 %). 2ndIBTE were grade 1/2 (75 %), with positive hormonal receptor (85 %) and clear surgical margins (no ink on tumor, 90.3 %). In the APBI classification, 21 pts were high-risk (18.6 %), while 77 % were Luminal A/BHer2-. With a MFU of 121.5 months [CI95% 111.7-129.6], 10-year 3rdIBTE-FS was 89 % [83-96]. Then-year RRFS, MDFS, DFS, SS and OS were 94 % [89-100], 89 % [83-96], 78 % [70-87], 95 % [91-100] and 94 % [90 -99] respectively. In multivariate analysis, APBI classification (high-risk; HR2.66 [1.01-7.1], p = 0.049) and tumor size (≥20 mm; HR2.64 [1.02-6.8], p = 0.045) were considered independent prognostic factors for DFS.Ninety-seven late complications were observed (fibrosis 64 %) with 6.2 % G ≥ 3 late toxicity. Cosmetic outcome was excellent/good in 91.2 %. Conclusions: With long follow-up, 2ndIBTE managed with 2ndCT allows second breast preservation without oncological outcome compromise and acceptable G ≥ 3 toxicity.

Partial breast irradiation: An updated consensus statement from the American brachytherapy society.

PURPOSE: In recent years, results with mature follow-up have been reported for several Phase III trials randomizing women to receive whole breast irradiation (WBI) versus varying modalities of partial breast irradiation (PBI). It is important to recognize that these methods vary in terms of volume of breast tissue treated, dose per fraction, and duration of therapy. As such, clinical and technical guidelines may vary among the various PBI techniques. METHODS: Members of the American Brachytherapy Society with expertise in PBI performed an extensive literature review focusing on the highest quality data available for the numerous PBI options offered in the modern era. Data were evaluated for strength of evidence and published outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: The majority of women enrolled on randomized trials of WBI versus PBI have been age >45 years with tumor size <3 cm, negative margins, and negative lymph nodes. The panel also concluded that PBI can be offered to selected women with estrogen receptor negative and/or Her2 amplified breast cancer, as well as ductal carcinoma in situ, and should generally be avoided in women with extensive lymphovascular space invasion. CONCLUSIONS: This updated guideline summarizes published clinical trials of PBI methods. The panel also highlights the role of PBI for women facing special circumstances, such as history of cosmetic breast augmentation or prior breast irradiation, and discusses promising novel modalities that are currently under study, such as ultrashort and preoperative PBI. Updated consensus guidelines are also provided to inform patient selection for PBI and to characterize the strength of evidence to support varying PBI modalities.

Single fraction of HDR brachytherapy for prostate cancer: Results of the SiFEPI phase II prospective trial.

Purpose: To report the results of the Single Fraction Early Prostate Irradiation (SiFEPI) phase 2 prospective trial. Materials/Methods: The SiFEPI trial (NCT02104362) evaluated a single fraction of high-dose rate brachytherapy (HDB) for low- (LR) and favorable-intermediate (FIR) risk prostate cancers. After rectal spacer placement, a single fraction of 20 Gy was delivered to the prostate. Oncological outcome (biochemical (bRFS) and local (lRFS) relapses, disease-free (DFS) and overall (OS) survivals and toxicity (acute/late genito-urinary (GU), gastro-intestinal (GI) and sexual (S) toxicities were investigated. Results: From 03/2014 to 10/2017, 35 pts were enrolled, of whom 33 were evaluable. With a median age of 66 y [46-79], 25 (76 %) and 8 (24 %) pts were LR and FIR respectively. With a MFU of 72.8 months [64-86], 6y-bRFS, lRFS and mRFS were 62 % [45-85], 61 % [44-85] and 93 % [85-100] respectively while 6y-DFS, CSS and OS were 54 % [37-77], 100 % and 89 % [77-100] respectively. Late GU, GI and S toxicities were observed in 11 pts (33 %;18G1), 4 pts (12 %;4G1) and 7 pts (21 %;1G1,5G2,1G3) respectively. Biochemical relapse (BR) was observed in 11 pts (33 %;7LR,4FIR) with a median time interval between HDB and BR of 51 months [24-69]. Nine of these pts (82 %) presented a histologically proven isolated local recurrence. Conclusions: Long-term results of the SiFEPI trial show that a single fraction of 20 Gy leads to sub-optimal biochemical control for LR/FIR prostate cancers. The late GU and GI toxicity profile is encouraging, leading to consideration of HDB as a safe irradiation technique.

High-dose-rate brachytherapy boost for elderly patients with intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer: 5-year clinical outcome of the PROSTAGE cohort.

Purpose: To analyze the oncological outcome in elderly (>70 years) prostate cancer after high-dose rate brachytherapy (HDB) boost. Materials/methods: In this retrospective study, patients with intermediate (IR) and high-risk (HR) prostate cancer underwent external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) followed by HDB boost with/without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). The impact of age (≤70y vs. > 70y) was investigated. Oncological outcome focused on biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS), cause-specific (CSS) and overall survival (OS). Late genito-urinary (GU) and gastro-intestinal (GI) toxicities were investigated. Results: From 07/08 to 01/22, 518 pts received a HDB boost, and 380 were analyzed (≤70y:177pts [46.6%] vs. > 70y:203pts [53.4%]). Regarding NCCN classification, 98 pts (≤70y: 53pts; >70y: 45pts; p = 0.107) and 282 pts (≤70y: 124pts; >70y: 158pts; p = NS) were IR and HR pts respectively. Median EBRT dose was 46 Gy [37.5-46] in 23 fractions [14-25]. HDB boost delivered a single fraction of 14/15 Gy (79%). ADT was used in 302 pts (≤70y: 130pts; >70y: 172pts; p = 0.01). With MFU of 72.6 months [67-83] for the whole cohort, 5-y bRFS, 5-y CSS and 5-y OS were 88% [85-92], 99% [97-100] and 94% [92-97] respectively; there was no statistical difference between the two age groups except for 5-y CSS (p = 0.05). Late GU and GI toxicity rates were 32.4% (G ≥ 3 7.3%) and 10.1% (no G3) respectively. Conclusions: For IR and HR prostate cancers, HDB boost leads to high rates of disease control with few late G ≥ 3 GU/GI toxicities. For elderly pts, HDB boost remains warranted mainly in HR pts, while competing comorbidity factors influence OS.

Irradiation of localized prostate cancer in the elderly: A systematic literature review.

Purpose: To analyze the literature that addresses radiation therapy for intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer (PC) in the elderly. Patients and methods: A PubMed literature search was conducted including articles from 01/01/2000 to 30/06/21, with the following keywords: PC, radiotherapy/brachytherapy and elderly. The analysis mainly focused on the issue of under-treatment in the elderly and the benefit/risk balance of irradiation. Results: Of the 176 references analyzed, 24 matched the selection criteria. The definition of "elderly patient" varied from 70 to 80 years. The analysis was impacted by the inhomogeneous primary end points used in each cohort. Age was often an obstacle to radical treatment, with a subsequent risk of under-treatment, particularly in patients with a poorer prognosis. However, comparable elderly oncological outcomes were compared to younger patients, both with external beam radiotherapy alone or combined with brachytherapy boost. Late toxicity rates are low and most often comparable to younger populations. However, a urinary over- toxicity was observed in the super-elderly (>80 years) after brachytherapy boost. The use of ADT should be considered in light of comorbidities, and may even be deleterious in some patients. Conclusion: Due to the increase in life expectancy, the management of PC in the elderly is a challenge for patients, clinicians and health insurance payers. Except for unfit men, elderly patients remain candidates for optimal curative treatment (i.e. regardless of age) after oncogeriatric assessment. More solid data from prospective trials conducted specially in this population will provide better guidance in our daily clinical practice.

Propensity score analysis of radical proctectomy versus organ preservation using contact X-ray brachytherapy for rectal cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Radical proctectomy (RP-TME) with neo adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) remains the standard treatment for T2-T3 rectal cancer. Organ preservation (OP) using CRT and a "watch and wait" strategy (W&W) is a field of research. Planned organ preservation can be proposed for early T1-T3 using contact X-ray brachytherapy (CXB). We compared the oncological outcomes of both approaches using a propensity score matched-cohort analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: For comparative analyses between patients with nCRT + RP-TME and patients with CXB + CRT, propensity scores were calculated with logistic regression and multiple imputations for missing data. The variables included in the propensity score model were PS status, T-N stage and rectal circumference extension. Patients were matched 1:1 using the nearest neighbor method with a 0.1 caliper restriction. The 5-year Cancer Specific survival was the primary end point. RESULTS: The Accord 12 phase III trial included 584 patients who treated with nCRT + RP-TME. The CXB cohort included 71 patients with a planned OP. To select OP patient candidate, T4, tumor with extension >66% circumference were eliminated and only patients treated with CXB + CRT were analyzed in the CXB cohort resulting in a total of 374 patients. A one to one paired cohort with 36 patients in each group was derived. These two cohorts were well matched for all confounding factors except for age. The 5-year cancer specific rate showed no significant difference between the two groups (89% in Accord 12 vs 82% in CXB; p = 0.84). At 5 years, rate of metastasis (15% vs 22%, p = 0.54) showed no significant difference. In the CXB group 33/36 patients preserved their rectum. CONCLUSION: The organ preservation strategy using CXB boost yielded a 5-year cancer specific survival rate similar to patients treated with RP-TME. In selected early T2-3 rectal adenocarcinoma an organ preservation strategy could be offered as a reasonable option.

Preoperative high-dose-rate brachytherapy for high-risk early-stage cervical cancer: Long-term clinical outcome analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To report long-term oncological and toxicity outcomes after high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDB) followed by oncologic surgery for patients with early-stage cervical cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 2005 to 2019, all patients treated with preoperative HDB at Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center for early-stage (IB1-IB2-IIA - FIGO 2018) cervical cancer with local relapse risk factors were included. HDB was performed followed by hysterectomy. Oncological and toxicity outcomes were evaluated prospectively. RESULTS: We identified 61 patients, with a median follow-up of 84 months. Posthysterectomy complete pathological response was observed in 46 patients (75.4%). Six patients (9.8%) experienced recurrence, including 4 local relapses (6.6%), and 2 deaths (3.3%) due to cervical cancer. Five-year local, nodal and metastatic relapse-free survivals were 94% (95% CI 87-100%), 96% (95% CI 90-100%) and 93% (95% CI 86-100%) respectively. Five-year overall survival was 98% (95% CI 95-100%). No grade ≥ 3 acute toxicity was observed, and 3 patients (4.9%) experienced grade 2 acute toxicity. One patient presented grade 4 late digestive toxicity, and 6 patients had grade 2 late toxicity. Only 1 patient still had grade 2 toxicity, after 9 years follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, we are reporting the longest follow-up of a preoperative HDB cohort. With similar oncological outcomes and less morbidity compared to primary surgery treatment followed more or less by adjuvant radiotherapy, HDB followed by hysterectomy could be a promising therapeutic option for early-stage cervical cancers with poor prognostic factors.

High-dose-rate brachytherapy boost for locally advanced cervical cancer: Oncological outcome and toxicity analysis of 4 fractionation schemes.

PURPOSE: Brachytherapy (BT) boost after radio-chemotherapy (RCT) is a standard of care in the management of locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). As there is no consensus on high-dose-rate (HDR) BT fractionation schemes, our aim was to report the oncological outcome and toxicity profile of four different schemes using twice-a-day (BID) HDR-BT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was an observational, retrospective, single institution study for patients with LACC receiving a HDR-BT boost. The latter was performed with a single implant and single imaging done on day 1. The different fractionation schemes were: 7 Gy + 4x3.5 Gy (group 1); 7 Gy + 4x4.5 Gy (group 2); 3x7Gy (group 3) and 3x8Gy (group 4). Local (LFS), nodal (NFS) and metastatic (MFS) recurrence-free survival as well as progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Acute (≤6 months) and late toxicities (>6 months) were reported. RESULTS: From 2007 to 2018, 191 patients were included. Median follow-up was 57 months [45-132] and median EQD210D90CTVHR was 84, 82 and 90 Gy for groups 2, 3 and 4 respectively (dosimetric data missing for group 1). The 5-year LFS, NFS, MFS, PFS and OS were 85% [81-90], 83% [79-86], 70% [67-73], 61% [57-64] and 75% [69-78] respectively, with no significant difference between the groups. EQD210D90CTVHR < 85 Gy was a prognostic factor for local recurrence in univariate analysis (p = 0.045). The rates of acute/late grade ≥ 2 urinary, digestive and gynecological toxicities were 9%/15%, 3%/15% and 9%/25% respectively. CONCLUSION: Bi-fractionated HDR-BT boost seems feasible with good oncological outcome and slightly more toxicity after dose escalation.

Resident training in brachytherapy in France: A 10-year update after the first survey of SFJRO members.

Purpose: A previous survey conducted in 2012 showed that 82% of radiation oncology residents felt they were not receiving optimal brachytherapy training. With almost 10 years of hindsight, the aim was to update these results. Material and methods: An anonymized questionnaire based on the 2012 survey was submitted to the 161 French residents enrolled in the 2021 French Society of Young Radiation Oncologists (Société Française des Jeunes Radiothérapeutes Oncologues - SFJRO) national brachytherapy courses. Results: With a participation rate of 73%, 86% of the residents were interested in brachytherapy, but 80% consider their training in brachytherapy insufficient. 88% and 69% of the residents stated that they knew gynecological and prostate brachytherapy indications correctly, respectively. The residents have achieved proficiency in the technique of brachytherapy of vaginal vault in 36% (compared with 21% in 2012), utero-vaginal in 13% (12% in 2012), including 4% with interstitial implants, and prostate in only 4% (4% in 2012). In their brachytherapy internships, 18% of the residents declared having no role or an observational role. The main obstacles to training were the need to go to several centers to see several indications (85%), lack of brachytherapy activity in the center (72%), and the difficulty of freeing themselves from hospital duties (71%). Conclusions: With results globally stable compared with 2012, brachytherapy training needs improvement. In the absence of a mandatory internship in a reference center or dedicated fellowships, residents must have protected access to training sites by favoring inter-hospital exchanges.

Brachytherapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer to the penis.

The origin of penile metastases is in 70% of cases from primary pelvic cancers (genitourinary and recto-sigmoid primary tumors). The prognosis is poor and it is often associated with synchronous bone metastases at the time of diagnosis. We present the case of a 61-year-old patient who developed a penile induration 7 years after radical prostatectomy followed by adjuvant external beam radiation therapy for high-risk prostatic adenocarcinoma. Biopsies confirmed the metastatic localization and a detailed assessment failed to find any further remote lesions. Faced with this penile oligometastatic prostate cancer, we proposed an ablative treatment based on interstitial multi-catheter high-dose rate brachytherapy. At the six-month follow-up, clinical examination and 68Ga-PSMA-11-PET confirmed a complete response of the penile tumor without new lesion at a distance.